President John F. Kennedy 50th, Case Solved

Chapter Six
Sections
6.1 The 50 Year Law
6.2 Sample Ruling: Sequester D. A. Henry Wade
6.3 Sample Ruling: Terminology Assassin or Individual
6.4 Sample Ruling: Autopsy Dr. Earl Rose Medical Examiner
6.5 Sample Ruling: Legality of Warren Commission 


6.1 The 50 Year Law
JFK 50 Year Jubilee Hearings Forum

Our original online forum was launched February 2011 for the upcoming 50th Anniversary (November 22, 2063) as a challenge to all researchers and fact finders to put together a Petition to the Government to have a final all holds barred second Commission of any sense as a real Public Trial with Due Process and all Constitutional Law applied to put to rest for all time and bring closure finally for the solving of the JFK Assassination "cold case". It is even suggested or requested to have a panel of top respectable Researchers made "Special Prosecutors" along with Government prosecution or, better, as an independent component in a unique special hearing/trial with Lee Harvey Oswald defense represented as the third part, presumably Atty. Mark Lane, affording full power of subpoena and et cetera et al. Although the challenge went virtually without response, our forum has enjoyed approximately 100 Visitors daily for a couple years time so there has been plenty of interest. Link: (This is also where all the scribble notes of this eBook where compiled).....
JFK 50 Year Jubilee Hearings
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php
Solved by the Administrator (My Conclusion) [eBook based scribble notes]
http://jfk50yearjubilee.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,165.0.html

The namesake of the forum is from the Christian Holy Bible (Authorized King James Holy Bible, only approved English language translation). The Jubile is a 50 year law for Israelites, and I have included the text below. It is actually commanded to do so by God, and in viewing all the laws to be adhered to you get a good idea of the benefits. You will find in the "About The Author" section mentioned I have a nominal degree in Accounting, and in extended economics study I have noticed the economic trends of the history of America. Generally there has been major economic Recession about every 20 years and major Depression about every 50 years. Kind of coincidence perhaps, and may give an insight to some of the wisdom of God, as there is much similar type measures taken in vast numbers of bankruptcies filed in these economic  times and how things get written off to make best reconciliation of debt like a starting anew, which nationally begins the new upswing economic trend that without the forgiveness would simply stagnate into ruin even of a nation. It is also interesting to note an original Copyright Law for authors is 50 years in America before perhaps entering Public Domain - a similar release. Included ahead shall be some sample rulings that may occur in a new JFK Hearing.

Leviticus Chapter 25 (Old Testament)
1 And the Lord spake unto Moses in mount Sinai, saying,
2 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye come into the land which I give you, then shall the land keep a sabbath unto the Lord.
3 Six years thou shalt sow thy field, and six years thou shalt prune thy vineyard, and gather in the fruit thereof;
4 But in the seventh year shall be a sabbath of rest unto the land, a sabbath for the Lord: thou shalt neither sow thy field, nor prune thy vineyard.
5 That which groweth of its own accord of thy harvest thou shalt not reap, neither gather the grapes of thy vine undressed: for it is a year of rest unto the land.  
6 And the sabbath of the land shall be meat for you; for thee, and for thy servant, and for thy maid, and for thy hired servant, and for thy stranger that sojourneth with thee,
7 And for thy cattle, and for the beast that are in thy land, shall all the increase thereof be meat.
8 ¶And thou shalt number seven sabbaths of years unto thee, seven times seven years; and the space of the seven sabbaths of years shall be unto thee forty and nine years.
9 Then shalt thou cause the trumpet of the jubile to sound on the tenth day of the seventh month, in the day of atonement shall ye make the trumpet sound throughout all your land.
10 And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubile unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family.
11 A jubile shall that fiftieth year be unto you: ye shall not sow, neither reap that which groweth of itself in it, nor gather the grapes in it of thy vine undressed.
12 For it is the jubile; it shall be holy unto you: ye shall eat the increase thereof out of the field.
13 In the year of this jubile ye shall return every man unto his possession.
14 And if thou sell ought unto thy neighbour, or buyest ought of thy neighbour's hand, ye shall not oppress one another:
15 According to the number of years after the jubile thou shalt buy of thy neighbour, and according unto the number of years of the fruits he shall sell unto thee:
16 According to the multitude of years thou shalt increase the price thereof, and according to the fewness of years thou shalt diminish the price of it: for according to the number of the years of the fruits doth he sell unto thee.
17 Ye shall not therefore oppress one another; but thou shalt fear thy God: for I am the Lord your God.
18 ¶Wherefore ye shall do my statutes, and keep my judgments, and do them; and ye shall dwell in the land in safety.
19 And the land shall yield her fruit, and ye shall eat your fill, and dwell therein in safety.
20 And if ye shall say, What shall we eat the seventh year? behold, we shall not sow, nor gather in our increase:
21 Then I will command my blessing upon you in the sixth year, and it shall bring forth fruit for three years.
22 And ye shall sow the eighth year, and eat yet of old fruit until the ninth year; until her fruits come in ye shall eat of the old store.
23 ¶The land shall not be sold for ever: for the land is mine; for ye are strangers and sojourners with me.
24 And in all the land of your possession ye shall grant a redemption for the land.
25 ¶If thy brother be waxen poor, and hath sold away some of his possession, and if any of his kin come to redeem it, then shall he redeem that which his brother sold.
26 And if the man have none to redeem it, and himself be able to redeem it;
27 Then let him count the years of the sale thereof, and restore the overplus unto the man to whom he sold it; that he may return unto his possession.
28 But if he be not able to restore it to him, then that which is sold shall remain in the hand of him that hath bought it until the year of jubile: and in the jubile it shall go out, and he shall return unto his possession.
29 And if a man sell a dwelling house in a walled city, then he may redeem it within a whole year after it is sold; within a full year may he redeem it.
30 And if it be not redeemed within the space of a full year, then the house that is in the walled city shall be established for ever to him that bought it throughout his generations: it shall not go out in the jubile.
31 But the houses of the villages which have no wall round about them shall be counted as the fields of the country: they may be redeemed, and they shall go out in the jubile.
32 Notwithstanding the cities of the Levites, and the houses of the cities of their possession, may the Levites redeem at any time.
33 And if a man purchase of the Levites, then the house that was sold, and the city of his possession, shall go out in the year of jubile: for the houses of the cities of the Levites are their possession among the children of Israel.
34 But the field of the suburbs of their cities may not be sold; for it is their perpetual possession.
35 ¶And if thy brother be waxen poor, and fallen in decay with thee; then thou shalt relieve him: yea, though he be a stranger, or a sojourner; that he may live with thee.
36 Take thou no usury of him, or increase: but fear thy God; that thy brother may live with thee.
37 Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase.
38 I am the Lord your God, which brought you forth out of the land of Egypt, to give you the land of Canaan, and to be your God.
39 ¶And if thy brother that dwelleth by thee be waxen poor, and be sold unto thee; thou shalt not compel him to serve as a bondservant:
40 But as an hired servant, and as a sojourner, he shall be with thee, and shall serve thee unto the year of jubile:
41 And then shall he depart from thee, both he and his children with him, and shall return unto his own family, and unto the possession of his fathers shall he return.
42 For they are my servants, which I brought forth out of the land of Egypt: they shall not be sold as bondmen.
43 Thou shalt not rule over him with rigour; but shalt fear thy God.
44 Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids.
45 Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession.
46 And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with rigour.
47 ¶And if a sojourner or stranger wax rich by thee, and thy brother that dwelleth by him wax poor, and sell himself unto the stranger or sojourner by thee, or to the stock of the stranger's family:
48 After that he is sold he may be redeemed again; one of his brethren may redeem him:
49 Either his uncle, or his uncle's son, may redeem him, or any that is nigh of kin unto him of his family may redeem him; or if he be able, he may redeem himself.
50 And he shall reckon with him that bought him from the year that he was sold to him unto the year of jubile: and the price of his sale shall be according unto the number of years, according to the time of an hired servant shall it be with him.
51 If there be yet many years behind, according unto them he shall give again the price of his redemption out of the money that he was bought for.
52 And if there remain but few years unto the year of jubile, then he shall count with him, and according unto his years shall he give him again the price of his redemption.
53 And as a yearly hired servant shall he be with him: and the other shall not rule with rigour over him in thy sight.
54 And if he be not redeemed in these years, then he shall go out in the year of jubile, both he, and his children with him.
55 For unto me the children of Israel are servants; they are my servants whom I brought forth out of the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God. 


6.2 Sample Ruling: Sequester D. A. Henry Wade
Sample Ruling, Sequester: Dallas County D. A. Henry Wade et al

Sequester: Dallas County D. A. Henry Wade et al

Update Concerning Trial and Legal Standing.....

In a simple brief lifetime review of Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade (JFK, Oswald, Ruby) in the article below, it is VERY CLEAR about the reputation of Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade - not the legacy wished - that aligns D.A. Wade in any realm of the legal instrument of "impingement" http://www.thefreedictionary.com/impinge (as with evidence) as to set aside all involvement with the Murder/Assassination Investigation of President John F. Kennedy, and this includes of course Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby events.

Article Review / Read:
NBC News Article:
DALLAS — After Dallas DA’s death, 19 convictions undone Most cases involved black defendants; some praise preservation of DNA....
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/25917791/

Henry Wade
(Dallas County District Attorney - JFK, Oswald, Ruby)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Wade

However appropriately worded and invoked, should lay to the side as sequestered  http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sequester
All involvement by Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade and ALL under him, involved. This concludes that jurisdiction over the Murder/Assassination Investigation of President John F. Kennedy (includes of course Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby events) can not be relied on or accepted and not jurisdiction of the investigation. This means all involvement by Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade and all under him is in review for investigation.

It is plain and evident that in these areas historically resulting in actual Civil War to secure Due Process of Law under the United States Constitution as Law of the Land. In other words, any public and fair trial did not even exist until victory - and then necessarily adding so many laws to enforce Liberty and Justice for over 100 years. This is not even mentioning Jury. It is mentioning simple basic Bill of Rights Law.

And so district authority is removed in the cases, and in place the remedy by Law as to whether Federal necessary upon inquest. What applies.... "...which district shall have been previously ascertained by law..." .....

The Bill of Rights and Other Amendments - U.S. Constitution
http://usconstitution.com/bill-of-rights
(Bill of Rights)
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Ironically, this is as well a basis for Atty. Mark Lane who agreed with Mrs. Oswald to defend Lee Harvey Oswald before the Warren Commission, as is the Rights of all Americans as Due Process of Law.

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Again, district authority is removed in the cases is apparent until.....

U.S. Constitution - Amendment 25
3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.

4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

(In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.) (This clause in parentheses has been modified by the 20th and 25th Amendments.)

Original Law states....
"....until the Disability be removed...."

This is extended as inference to all positions of Government - Federal, State, Local, other - and certainly applies to all involvement by Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade and all under him in the Murder/Assassination Investigation of President John F. Kennedy (includes of course Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby events). In the least is saying a review is in order. In the least is saying to reopen the case in that jurisdiction requires these such events of impingement and sequestration. Much as US Courts of Appeals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_courts_of_appeals) sat to hear Appeals for the Supreme Court, whether valid to proceed, there must be a similar Judicial authority in place of the Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade and ALL under him involved as well extends to the Presidential Commission as the Warren Report and its validity or even jurisdiction or to be itself sequestered as impingement itself to the case(s).

Of course I hold that America has an "appellate jurisdiction" meaning no intervention by any body of Law or Judicial has any legal right to say or declare what cases they will hear or not.....

Article III
Section 2.
In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.

And so apparently "politics, the science of spin city" has turned the Law as "the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction" somehow now means they have the right by and with "such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make" - has turned the Law into being unlawfully interpreted as meaning these have the right to judge what appeal the Supreme Court will accept to hear, with their bullcrap excuses and reasons for the others they decide not to hear. This is denial of Due Process. The Law, "...the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction" is defining the role, authority, and power of the Supreme Court in the United States as being the appeal receiver from lower courts to rule on it, as these Justices are to be our best as understanding our Law. It is defining them as having some despot power or all power in all court and Law of the Land and so on. It defines them as not having some tyrannical position, but is defining them rather as a last resort in America per Appeal in hearing a case that seems to be above understanding of position, or some unlawfulness in fact or witness etc etc etc. not in hearing in lower courts. This the Founding Fathers made Law of the Land by and with Americans so that for any nefarious (dark) reason a lower court could not wrongfully and illegally put Americans to hurt with some political view and interpretation of the Law as convenient to serve their means against someone. All Americans have the Right Of Appeal in the United States. In less terms, there is no attachment to the Right of Appeal in America - period.

I site the foundation by Imminent Domain (and as upheld by God) as to the interpretation of Law as precedent being the Declaration of Independence being cause and reason for the institution of the United States Constitution.... "transient causes"...

"IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance....."

Need I say more about Chief Justice William Howard Taft ?

THE UNLAWFUL CHANGE...
This is unconstitutional in my opinion and anyone American or sane....
"....The right of automatic appeal for most types of decisions of a court of appeals was ended by an Act of Congress, the Judiciary Act of 1925. This law was urged by Chief Justice William Howard Taft, and it also reorganized many other things in the federal court system. ...."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_courts_of_appeals

Again, I hold that America has an "appellate jurisdiction" meaning no intervention by any body of Law or Judicial has any legal right to say or declare what cases they will hear or not hear. That is denial of due process of the law - appellate jurisdiction as Law of the Land, period, and all Judges are bound by it. Or this means no one from the lower court has any right to determine "validity" or 'grounds" for any appeal. The Appeal is heard by the higher court and no one else for any reason, simply for validity as like Probable Cause for any arrest. Obviously the lower court decision being appealed against is in conflict of the law or as a "hostile witness". Under appellate jurisdiction, how could those possibly be considered as "hearing grounds for appeal" ? If in the higher court it is determined this was other than realistic and genuine as superfluous - then that party is to be charged with that. What lawyer would go to jail and lose practice over some bad defendant trying to buy time with an appeal against a sentence etc, or pulling a prank for spite, or trying simply to remain in a less secure local prison to attempt escape while waiting for hearing ? And so the Defendant Lawyer has their reputation on the line as well, and will not engage frivolous nonsense, and nonetheless will not attain Appeal in those type events.



6.3 Sample Ruling: Terminology Assassin or Individual
Possible Defense Actions Taken

Sample Ruling: Terminology Assassin or Individual

This is meant as possible grounds for/by the Defense Attorney (Mark Lane) of and for Lee Harvey Oswald for libelous suits against the Free Press in Dallas,others, and against the Warren Commission including a cease and desist for the Free Press...... If there was a "Dream Team" (OJ Simpson) of the day for Oswald - this no doubt would be a piece of the flurry of activities initiated by them in Defense of their client for the "crime of the century". Note that this would be really superfluous but would be a measure for Defense to take control and put on notice the degree of intensity intended throughout the trial - along those lines. It is only suggested......

In that Lee Harvey Oswald was suspect and in custody and then murdered in custody and without any other suspects, in turn this coupled with evidence was then deemed "case closed" as the initial evidence against Lee Harvey Oswald suggested a sole murderer. The terminology of "assassin" is itself prejudiced as rush to judgement of intent and seems the classic "Freudian slip of the tongue" whereby the rest of the description offered was "lone assassin" and "lone nut" and then concluded as "senseless murder". On one hand the term "senseless murder by a lone disturbed individual" was suggested. However, on the other hand the term "assassin" denies that as indicating political intent. This terminology, "lone assassin", indicates he was deemed representing the U.S.S.R. in any fashion according to the introduction of his individual history of connection with the U.S.S.R. and a self professed "Marxist" publicly.

For Due Process in a court of law this would be leading to a conclusion inappropriately and would be struck down. "Just the Facts M'aam". The motive has nothing to do with Warrant For Arrest and does not legally serve as Probable Cause for Warrant for Arrest and Search and Seizure. The facts of the deceased, the murder weapon, the person in possession of same, physically placed at the scene of murder, witnesses testimony of all, and so on are the only legal basis for arrest - or unless actually observed by Law Officials (Police, FBI etc) committing the crime.

The introduction of "lone assassin" of the Commander in Chief (US President) implicates punishable Treason or Insurrection above a Sedition (unarmed) charge under US constitutional law and can only be arrested and convicted with at least two witnesses of the act under the law. There was not even one witness identifying Lee Harvey Oswald as the gunman. Is he charged with a personal crime of misguided passion albeit "lone nut" - or is he being charged as a willing political dissident committing an act of treason in full cognizance?

Understandably there was the sense of panic and mass hysteria to any degree by America itself.

Assassin / Definition http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/assassin
2: a person who commits murder; especially : one who murders a politically important person either for hire or from fanatical motives

Semantics ? Don't play them in a court of law. If Oswald is accused as "assassin" then "personal attack" on the President does not count as motive as "assassin" indicating murder via "for hire" or for "political views and convictions" as part of that political citizenship or entity under its government as supporting its cause - which introduces Insurrection or Treason (invasion).

The Warren Commission in one conclusion defined Lee Harvey Oswald as narcissist, and by definition would be a personal attack as opposed to an actual assassin attack. In other words, as a narcissist - the murder was for the "high" of committing the act and nothing to do with an assassination - either for hire or political and other, such as religious persecution as a crucifixion of any degree. To make such the charge of narcissism needs be by a qualified licensed medical doctor - Psychiatrist - based on medical and legal science as fact of law and inclusion of such as Sado-Masochist and on and on, which evidence would have to be produced as the mental state of Lee Harvey Oswald taken into custody for the crime and charged. In other words, to the contrary is not supported by Law as obviously an unqualified statement by other than a licensed professional medical doctor acceptable as evidence in a court of law as witness against the defendant. Therefore "lone nut" as well has no foundation as unqualified, not a professional medical or legal opinion of fact.

 Cease and Desist orders sought for from the Court. Lee Harvey Oswald shall be addressed as "Defendant" if so charged for the murder of President John F. Kennedy. The Fourteenth Amendment Section 1 provides that no jurisdiction deny to any person within its jurisdiction the Equal Protection of the laws. Cease and Desist may not save the County/State/Federal cost of a new trial venue with the current pollution of the jury pool within this jurisdiction.


6.4 Sample Ruling: Autopsy Dr. Earl Rose Medical Examiner
Sample Ruling: Dr. Earl Rose, the Dallas County Medical Examiner

The following Point Of Law was raised by Dr. Earl Rose, the Dallas County Medical Examiner claiming legal duty of autopsy.....

SOURCE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_autopsy
John F. Kennedy autopsy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The autopsy of President John F. Kennedy was performed, beginning at about 8 p.m. and ending at about midnight EST, on Nov. 22, 1963, the day of his assassination, at the then Bethesda Naval Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland. The choice of autopsy hospital in the Washington, D.C. area was made at the request of Mrs. Kennedy, on the basis that John F. Kennedy had been a naval officer.

In 1963, Texas law required that the autopsy of a person murdered in Texas was to be conducted in Texas, unless the murder occurred in places owned, possessed, or controlled by the U.S. government. Thus, the murder and subsequent medical examination of President Kennedy was legally under the sole jurisdiction of the State of Texas. Texas law required an inquest by a justice of the peace for all homicides, and then, if ordered, an autopsy. Dr. Earl Rose, the Dallas County medical examiner, attempted to enforce this law as the Secret Service was removing President Kennedy's body from Parkland Memorial Hospital for immediate return to Washington, D.C. with Jacqueline Kennedy and President Lyndon B. Johnson. A justice of the peace arrived to support Dr. Rose. After a brief scuffle, the President's casket was taken by the Secret Service.[1] Dallas County district attorney, Henry Wade, told the justice in a telephone call that he had no objection to the removal of the president's body. ....."

Executable (Instruments of Law).....

"Thus, the murder and subsequent medical examination of President Kennedy was legally under the sole jurisdiction of the State of Texas."

This statement may be reviewed as inaccurate. Preceding it (above) is.....
"... In 1963, Texas law required that the autopsy of a person murdered in Texas was to be conducted in Texas, unless the murder occurred in places owned, possessed, or controlled by the U.S. government. ..."

Therefore the Commander in Chief - President of the United States of America - in all procession is in and of the Federal Seat of Government in full control as Commander In Chief along with all under his command which included that Federal militia (Secret Service) et al of this "Presidential Parade". The President is not a private citizen but rather Commander In Chief of the Armed Forces of America in Actual Service as commanding the general defense and safe conduct of the Nation at all times where is necessary and expedient. Those parts of the government of Dallas and Texas commanded the Due Process and Assembly yielded to the President and Vice President and security convoy as suspending the general population in those parts of the Presidential Route into and exiting Dallas and Texas.

By Due Process of Law, the President and other Government members have right of passage in a security fashion where necessary and appropriate - and involving the President the highest right of secured passage as always necessary and prudent. In shorter terms, President Kennedy was assassinated in route in place "....controlled by the U.S. government ..."
NOTE: In review, the Security appropriate in this event was questionably missing.


RULING.....
One of the greatest ignorances is that this murder was a "personal attack" on President John F. Kennedy and therefore the United States Government had no authority to investigate, however, of course Dallas Police Department did. This is based upon the single suspect Lee H. Oswald as reported. This is right and wrong.

What has been the apparent ignorance is failure to understand that the shooting of the President of the United States of America is an Act Of War - as being the Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces, President and Executive of the United States of America. All are in Actual Service, whether or not as Times of Peace, and not in their respective personal lives. Here, the Act Of War commencing as firing on the President of The United States as the Act of Treason - it is already Law and Remedy for such cases. Constitutional requirement of the United States Navy to remain in Service during Times Of Peace precludes the First Lady's request for the body to be taken to the US Navy autopsy proceedings contrite.

In an Act Of War, Treason, against the United States - here murder by weapon declared "assassination" of the Commander In Chief in Actual Service - the United States Constitution provides immediate legal remedy in a several fashion. What applies here apparently invoked by the Presidential Secret Service is authority and control of the expired Commander in Chief in Actual Service in "time of .... Public Danger...." to say the least. There is a good array of U.S. Law that applies for what is even perceived as or declared an Actual Invasion. These apply locally with the Police Departments as well in certain cases.

"Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger;...."

Further, the Writ of Habeas Corpus suspended in Actual Service in Time of War (martial law) or Public Danger takes authority of evidence as well as witness and defendant. Under the United States Constitution - Due Process is not denied, but disallowed for National Security purposes. In fact, these are the Due Process actions granted and Law of the Land in such cases, events. If there were no actions locally by the Dallas Departments or Offices or Seat to bring suit or arrest for violation of the existing statues, then let them rest that they performed as best and professionally possible in such the immediate danger that did not admit of delay.

In all common sense and rule, the entire Law of the Land for this event rested in the Vice President as now acting President of the United States as sworn into office per Constitutional Law and Procedure.

It is incomprehensible that the manner of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, in such the international dangers (Cuban Missile Crisis, etc), was not reported to the Vice President present by the Parkland Hospital attending Medical Staff revealing multiple head wounds, to say, multiple shooters. The conspiracy was known virtually immediately to the attending Medical Doctors in the Dallas ER with one of the nation's highest rates of gun shot wounds at the time received for emergency treatment. In observing these facts, the continuing lack of security in the safe conduct of the Vice President to the Presidential air carrier (Air Force One) was appalling and alarming. It was apparent by their actions (protection of the Vice President) that no perceived threat existed beyond the killing of the President. In shorter terms, the World event preceding this was the Cuban Missile Crisis so well known as the days the world came the closest to nuclear and conventional war which easily may escalate to a world war involving these two "super powers" of the world in opposition and conflict. The expected urgency as reaction to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy was not observed. It is further beyond comprehension as the suspect shortly arrested afterwards being known to Federal Authorities was involved in these circumstances (a defector) in some fashion and arrested, taken into custody.

ADDED..... Here at the beginning of this clip you can see Vice President Johnson walking from the Parkland Hospital to travel to the airport to return to Washington D.C. ....Plainly, he is walking almost virtually unguarded to say there was no "human shield" by the Secret Service and other Officials guarding his safe departure after the horrendous assassination that just occurred at such the time to such the man. A complete Military Escort was now expected and prudent but questionably unobserved.

From Parkland Memorial Hospital to Dallas Love Field Airport
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xel2lnpvY5Y

6.5 Sample Ruling: Legality of Warren Commission
Sample Ruling: Is the Warren Commission legal?

Now, a presidential commission inquest may be defined as just that and particularly and uniquely for this event - an exhaustive inquest of all facts related to the murder to ascertain national public danger as will not admit of delay in lieu of immediate Congressional action - thus the existing Presidential Powers vested. Such inquest commissioned is not and can not be construed as Due Process of Public Trial and apparently was not applied as such - regarding National Security and Suspension of the Writ Of Habeas Corpus invoked only engaged by subsequent imminent Congressional Powers as the public danger as treason and invasion or insurrection never transpired, thus imminent danger powers expired rapidly in the Presidential Powers for this as Commander In Chief and this applies to Actual Invasion or Insurrection. At best, the actual recorded history of the Warren Commission could only be inclusive as an Inquest Into Sedition and Insurrection against the United States regarding its length of operation and powers "formally " bestowed but only by the US Congress - thus defining the US Congress as uninvolved unless otherwise designated as a Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus as national security in the matter.

Again, Due Process requires Probable Cause to Suspend the Writ Of Habeas Corpus legally - and that means Congress indeed has declared a Conspiracy existing and must have that evidence and thus equals the entire National Security secrecy of the entire arena invoked - but and the which does not include a "national public play" as the Warren Commission to proceed publicly in operation as opposed to rule of law being secrecy and in secrecy. At best, President Lyndon B. Johnson could only attempt to determine if any "cout d'etat" existed immediately with the assassination of President Lincoln of record as foundation here in that Secretary of State Seward was also injured.
William H. Seward
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_H._Seward
"On the night of Lincoln's assassination, he survived an attempt on his life in the conspirators' effort to decapitate the Union government."
Coup d'état http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coup_d'%C3%A9tat
(Insurrection, clandestine or openly)

The Executive (Presidential) Authority for this Commission has to be defined by and of the Law. It is not evident, other than that indeed the Writ Of Habeas Corpus Suspension (martial law possession of case) was applied and it is indeed and was National Security device in the President and Congress and ongoing in newly elected Presidents and Congress Persons, which is evident Congress indeed has all lawful ability for such and of origin - but whereas evaporates in less than expedient action resultant in severally or mass arrest, or actual issuance of a Letter of Marque and Reprisal, or appropriate Military Response. The problem thus arises if the Commission itself was not legal that in turn the US Senate had no power to pass Senate Joint Resolution 137 (Public Law 88-202) authorizing the Commission to subpoena witnesses and obtain evidence concerning any matter relating to the investigation.

Probable Cause is issue for ANY investigation under US Law and must be supported....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

When considering the injuries of State of Texas Gov. John Connally we find perpetrator (s ) erred if pondered whether sole judicial authority would reside in the US Supreme Court ..... appellate Jurisdiction only is indicated in the event of "controversy ... state". LAW: Article III. Section. 1. .....all the which indicates any pattern of "intent to escape" prosecution by the including of wounding Gov. Connally intentionally along with other events either public or revealed per investigation. Obviously this pattern then includes the subsequent homicide which is then assassination of Presidential Candidate and Former United States Attorney General, Senator Robert Fitzgerald Kennedy in the same pattern of escape intentions whether such National Security device exists as perceived in gross ignorance. That event obviously establishes grounds for further ongoing investigation in the National Secrecy Policy being existential. The murder of Rev. Martin L. King as then assassination precludes in this same pattern the Sedition moved against the Religious Freedoms under the United States Constitution, but by statue declares Insurrection, whereas in gross ignorance perceived an avoidance in prosecution of/for religious persecutions are then evident in this pattern of events. As the Warren Commission itself declared, it can not rule out an unknown conspiracy obviously that is of persons unknown as well as the conspiracy not heard. This by definition reveals the perpetrator (s ) as atheist in gross ignorance as anti-christ according to the existence of, and lawfully protected, Faith in God of the which by eminent domain ruling is evident as partial foundation of the US Constitution in the Declaration of Independence with wording "God of Nature" perceived coupled with existence of the National Security Policy being existential.

Let's take a look at the legitimacy under law for the Warren Commission by President L. B. Johnson....
The Warren Commission
http://www.jfk-assassination.de/warren/index.php
"President Lyndon B. Johnson appointed the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, commonly called the Warren Commission, by Executive Order (E.O. 11130) on November 29, 1963. Its purpose was to investigate the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy on November 22, 1963, at Dallas, Texas. President Johnson directed the Commission to evaluate matters relating to the assassination and the subsequent killing of the alleged assassin, and to report its findings and conclusions to him. " ..... .....
"On December 13, 1963, Congress passed Senate Joint Resolution 137 (Public Law 88-202) authorizing the Commission to subpoena witnesses and obtain evidence concerning any matter relating to the investigation. The resolution also gave the Commission the power to compel the testimony of witnesses by granting immunity from prosecution to witnesses testifying under compulsion. The Commission, however, did not grant immunity to any witness during the investigation. "

US CONSTITUTION http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html
# The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
(Writ of Habeas Corpus is right of a defendant to be presented with all the body of evidence and added is all witnesses against them. Writ of Habeas Corpus suspended nationally equals or is martial law.)
# No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
(Bill of Attainder is an illegal law that would remove the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Ex Post Facto laws are illegal as making a law "after the fact" to prosecute. Due Process is for existential law of the land - existing law under US Constitution. With Probable Cause necessary, you can not "make it up as you go".)
# Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
# The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
(A person charged with Treason may not suffer Forfeiture of life [put to death] by captors until after lawful trial. Neither may they suffer Corruption of Blood [a spiritual or faith or political belief death] by their captors until after lawful trial. This is a biblical reference [Christian] meaning it is sin to eat the blood/life or to say partake in the evil life of another and living that life, which is extended to civic law here meaning being forced to give up a faith or spiritual belief or political convictions etc. Of ignorance it is said this is the same thing - "Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture" - which is impossible by the conjunction "or" = they are two separate things being compared as different from each other.)
# A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
# Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy; and the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either House on any question shall, at the Desire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on the Journal.
(National Security - Congress Journal - "....excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy...")
# Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
(Anyone charged with a crime in America may not be forced to testify against self - "nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself")
# Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
# Amendment VII
In Suits at common law, ..... the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Article. II. Section. 1.
# In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
Section. 2.
# The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.
Section. 3.
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.
# The Congress shall have Power ....To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court ; .... To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water ; .....To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces ; ....To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions ; ....To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
Article III. Section. 1.
The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
Section. 2.
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;-- between a State and Citizens of another State,--between Citizens of different States,--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.
Article. IV. Section. 1.
Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Attached:
Regardless if anyone is of Faith or not, traditionally the entire US Constitution, US Presidents, and Congressional Persons have been of faith - many notably - from the beginning. The US monies themselves have "In God We Trust" upon them. This may no doubt preclude the entire Presidential Warren Commission combined with the US Congress and all applicable parts of the USA Federal Government have maintained National Security Policy in the entire matter.

Briefly, the Authorized King James Holy Bible as basis of true faith (English speaking exact copy of the Hebrew/Jew Scriptures - Holy Bible) is the traditional centerpiece only which contains the interpretations in the New Testament Book Of Revelation concerning what is interpreted as inclusive of these events. It does indeed indicate those of Faith will be briefly overcome by the opposing force - antichrist. This has been interpreted as an underworld figure gaining a world connected "secret society" (which JFK gave speech on) that are indeed murderous in the least - and is indicated as residing as an underworld seat in the areas north of the State Of Israel - but actually in all candor - as ruling secretly the U.S.S.R. and thus Communism itself in various fashion from about the time of the birth of what was described in America of the day as "Red Communism" as not indicating any actual Communist Nation itself as guilty of any of this..... just those underworld figures gaining power through murder, violence, threats, adulteries, bribes, fixed elections, and so on. In other words, as example, it would be as if crime world figures such as Al Capone (Prohibition Era) and so on were ruling the American Government in such the fashion.

 SPECIAL NOTE.... My personal opinion of the Warren Commission has always been best expressed if I was a sketch writer for the Saturday Night Live segment Point/Counter Point with Jane Curtain and Dan Aykroyd - Jane commenting as like Chronkite did when the Warren Report was released along the lines Lee Harvey Oswald was found the lone assassin with no other evidence etc...... and Dan replies with the following counterpoint .....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k80nW6AOhTs

"Jane you ignorant sludtt! If there was a hole any larger than the one between your ears and legs it would be reserved only for the Devil himself in Hell. From every Magellan hopeful and telescope owner enthusiest and lucky child finding a toy refractor as a prize in a Cracker Jack box would assume to have discovered the eleventh planet "Turdsville" seeing the mountain of shidtt delivered to this city today in the worst indiscretion, alarm and shame since discovering a Cuban cigar is not one you smoke, but one that smokes you.
Indeed this is perhaps the worst sequel written as "An even funnier thing happened to me on my way to Cuba..." since the written Adolph Hitler version of the Holy Bible... Mein Kampf "...